On Mon, 31 May 2021 10:50:03 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To make our TAP parser (and me) happy we don't want to have to reports
"we want to have two reports" ?
If that's not what has been intended, I'm confused :)
> with exactly the same wording.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> s390x/selftest.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/s390x/selftest.c b/s390x/selftest.c
> index b2fe2e7b..c2ca9896 100644
> --- a/s390x/selftest.c
> +++ b/s390x/selftest.c
> @@ -47,12 +47,19 @@ static void test_malloc(void)
> *tmp2 = 123456789;
> mb();
>
> - report((uintptr_t)tmp & 0xf000000000000000ul, "malloc: got vaddr");
> - report(*tmp == 123456789, "malloc: access works");
> + report_prefix_push("malloc");
> + report_prefix_push("ptr_0");
> + report((uintptr_t)tmp & 0xf000000000000000ul, "allocated memory");
> + report(*tmp == 123456789, "wrote allocated memory");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("ptr_1");
> report((uintptr_t)tmp2 & 0xf000000000000000ul,
> - "malloc: got 2nd vaddr");
> - report((*tmp2 == 123456789), "malloc: access works");
> - report(tmp != tmp2, "malloc: addresses differ");
> + "allocated memory");
> + report((*tmp2 == 123456789), "wrote allocated memory");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report(tmp != tmp2, "allocated memory addresses differ");
>
> expect_pgm_int();
> configure_dat(0);
> @@ -62,6 +69,7 @@ static void test_malloc(void)
>
> free(tmp);
> free(tmp2);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char**argv)
