On 26/05/21 18:32, David Matlack wrote:
This comment was left over from a previous version of the patch that
introduced wrprot_gfn_range, when skip_4k was passed in instead of
min_level.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 95eeb5ac6a8a..237317b1eddd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1192,9 +1192,9 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
}
/*
- * Remove write access from all the SPTEs mapping GFNs [start, end). If
- * skip_4k is set, SPTEs that map 4k pages, will not be write-protected.
- * Returns true if an SPTE has been changed and the TLBs need to be flushed.
+ * Remove write access from all SPTEs at or above min_level that map GFNs
+ * [start, end). Returns true if an SPTE has been changed and the TLBs need to
+ * be flushed.
*/
static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
gfn_t start, gfn_t end, int min_level)
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
