On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:29 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Put version information in the subject, otherwise it's not always obvious which > patch you want to be accepted, e.g. > > [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix comment mentioning skip_4k Got it. My thinking was that I changed the title of the patch so should omit the v2, but that doesn't really make sense. > > On Wed, May 26, 2021, David Matlack wrote: > > This comment was left over from a previous version of the patch that > > introduced wrprot_gfn_range, when skip_4k was passed in instead of > > min_level. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
