On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 15:58 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021, Stamatis, Ilias wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 18:44 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Yes, but its existence is a complete hack. vmx->current_tsc_ratio has the same
> > > scope as vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio, i.e. vmx == vcpu == vcpu->arch. Unlike
> > > per-VMCS tracking, it should not be useful, keyword "should".
> > >
> > > What I meant by my earlier comment:
> > >
> > > Its use in vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs() is basically "write the VMCS if we forgot to
> > > earlier", which is all kinds of wrong.
> > >
> > > is that vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs() should never write vmcs.TSC_MULTIPLIER. The correct
> > > behavior is to set the field at VMCS initialization, and then immediately set it
> > > whenever the ratio is changed, e.g. on nested transition, from userspace, etc...
> > > In other words, my unclear feedback was to make it obsolete (and drop it) by
> > > fixing the underlying mess, not to just drop the optimization hack.
> >
> > I understood this and replied earlier. The right place for the hw multiplier
> > field to be updated is inside set_tsc_khz() in common code when the ratio
> > changes. However, this requires adding another vendor callback etc. As all
> > this is further refactoring I believe it's better to leave this series as is -
> > ie only touching code that is directly related to nested TSC scaling and not
> > try to do everything as part of the same series.
>
> But it directly impacts your code, e.g. the nested enter/exit flows would need
> to dance around the decache silliness. And I believe it even more directly
> impacts this series: kvm_set_tsc_khz() fails to handle the case where userspace
> invokes KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ while L2 is active.
>
> > This makes testing easier too.
>
> Hmm, sort of. Yes, the fewer patches/modifications in a series definitely makes
> the series itself easier to test. But stepping back and looking at the total
> cost of testing, I would argue that punting related changes to a later time
> increases the overall cost. E.g. if someone else picks up the clean up work,
> then they have to redo most, if not all, of the testing that you are already
> doing, including getting access to the proper hardware, understanding what tests
> to prioritize, etc... Whereas adding one more patch to your series is an
> incremental cost since you already have the hardware setup, know which tests to
> run, etc...
>
> > We can still implement these changes later.
>
> We can, but we shouldn't. Simply dropping vmx->current_tsc_ratio is not an
> option; it knowingly introduces a (minor) performance regression, for no reason
> other than wanting to avoid code churn. Piling more stuff on top of the flawed
> decache logic is impolite, as it adds more work for the person that ends up
> doing the cleanup. I would 100% agree if this were a significant cleanup and/or
> completely unrelated, but IMO that's not the case.
>
> Compile tested only...
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> index 029c9615378f..34ad7a17458a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP_NULL(has_wbinvd_exit)
> KVM_X86_OP(get_l2_tsc_offset)
> KVM_X86_OP(get_l2_tsc_multiplier)
> KVM_X86_OP(write_tsc_offset)
> +KVM_X86_OP(write_tsc_multiplier)
> KVM_X86_OP(get_exit_info)
> KVM_X86_OP(check_intercept)
> KVM_X86_OP(handle_exit_irqoff)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f099277b993d..a334ce7741ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1308,6 +1308,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
> u64 (*get_l2_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> u64 (*get_l2_tsc_multiplier)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void (*write_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset);
> + void (*write_tsc_multiplier)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 multiplier);
>
> /*
> * Retrieve somewhat arbitrary exit information. Intended to be used
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index b18f60463073..914afcceb46d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -1103,6 +1103,14 @@ static void svm_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset)
> vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_INTERCEPTS);
> }
>
> +static void svm_write_tsc_multiplier(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 l1_multiplier)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Handled when loading guest state since the ratio is programmed via
> + * MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO, not a field in the VMCB.
> + */
> +}
> +
> /* Evaluate instruction intercepts that depend on guest CPUID features. */
> static void svm_recalc_instruction_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> @@ -4528,6 +4536,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
> .get_l2_tsc_offset = svm_get_l2_tsc_offset,
> .get_l2_tsc_multiplier = svm_get_l2_tsc_multiplier,
> .write_tsc_offset = svm_write_tsc_offset,
> + .write_tsc_multiplier = svm_write_tsc_multiplier,
>
> .load_mmu_pgd = svm_load_mmu_pgd,
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 6058a65a6ede..712190493926 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
> vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, vcpu->arch.tsc_offset);
>
> if (kvm_has_tsc_control)
> - decache_tsc_multiplier(vmx);
> + vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio);
>
> nested_vmx_transition_tlb_flush(vcpu, vmcs12, true);
>
> @@ -4505,7 +4505,7 @@ void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vm_exit_reason,
> vmcs_write32(TPR_THRESHOLD, vmx->nested.l1_tpr_threshold);
>
> if (kvm_has_tsc_control)
> - decache_tsc_multiplier(vmx);
> + vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio);
>
> if (vmx->nested.change_vmcs01_virtual_apic_mode) {
> vmx->nested.change_vmcs01_virtual_apic_mode = false;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 4b70431c2edd..bf845a08995e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1390,11 +1390,6 @@ void vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu,
>
> vmx->loaded_vmcs->cpu = cpu;
> }
> -
> - /* Setup TSC multiplier */
> - if (kvm_has_tsc_control &&
> - vmx->current_tsc_ratio != vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio)
> - decache_tsc_multiplier(vmx);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1813,6 +1808,11 @@ static void vmx_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset)
> vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, offset);
> ...skipping...
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -322,8 +322,6 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
> /* apic deadline value in host tsc */
> u64 hv_deadline_tsc;
>
> - u64 current_tsc_ratio;
> -
> unsigned long host_debugctlmsr;
>
> /*
> @@ -532,12 +530,6 @@ static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(bool shadow)
> GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> }
>
> -static inline void decache_tsc_multiplier(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> -{
> - vmx->current_tsc_ratio = vmx->vcpu.arch.tsc_scaling_ratio;
> - vmcs_write64(TSC_MULTIPLIER, vmx->current_tsc_ratio);
> -}
> -
> static inline bool vmx_has_waitpkg(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> {
> return vmx->secondary_exec_control &
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b61b54cea495..690de1868873 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2179,14 +2179,16 @@ static u32 adjust_tsc_khz(u32 khz, s32 ppm)
> return v;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u64 l1_multiplier);
> +
> static int set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz, bool scale)
> {
> u64 ratio;
>
> /* Guest TSC same frequency as host TSC? */
> if (!scale) {
> - vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
> - vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
> + kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(vcpu, kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2212,7 +2214,7 @@ static int set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz, bool scale)
> return -1;
> }
>
> - vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio = vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = ratio;
> + kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(vcpu, ratio);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2224,8 +2226,7 @@ static int kvm_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz)
> /* tsc_khz can be zero if TSC calibration fails */
> if (user_tsc_khz == 0) {
> /* set tsc_scaling_ratio to a safe value */
> - vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
> - vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
> + kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(vcpu, kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio);
> return -1;
> }
>
> @@ -2383,6 +2384,25 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 l1_offset)
> static_call(kvm_x86_write_tsc_offset)(vcpu, vcpu->arch.tsc_offset);
> }
>
> +static void kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u64 l1_multiplier)
> +{
> + if (!kvm_has_tsc_control)
> + return;
> +
> + vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio = l1_multiplier;
> +
> + /* Userspace is changing the multiplier while L2 is active... */
> + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu))
> + vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_calc_nested_tsc_multiplier(
> + l1_multiplier,
> + static_call(kvm_x86_get_l2_tsc_multiplier)(vcpu));
> + else
> + vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = l1_multiplier;
> +
> + static_call(kvm_x86_write_tsc_multiplier)(vcpu, vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool kvm_check_tsc_unstable(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
Hmm, this patch actually still removes the caching and introduces a small
performance overhead. For example if neither L1 nor L2 are scaled it will
still do a vmwrite for every L2 entry/write.
So do we want to get rid of decache_tsc_multiplier() but keep
vmx->current_tsc_ratio and do the check inside write_tsc_multiplier()? Or
alternatively delete vmx->current_tsc_ratio too and have
write_tsc_multiplier() receive 2 parameters, one of the old multiplier and
one of the new?
