Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/05/21 16:09, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
You mean we'll be using:

"hv_evmcs_ptr == 0" meaning "no evmcs" (like now)
"hv_evmcs_ptr == -1" meaing "evmcs not yet mapped" (and
nested_evmcs_is_used() will check for both '0' and '-1')
"hv_evmcs_ptr == anything else" - eVMCS mapped.

I was thinking of:

hv_evmcs_ptr == -1 meaning no evmcs

hv_evmcs == NULL meaning "evmcs not yet mapped" (I think)

hv_evmcs != NULL meaning "evmcs mapped".

As usual with my suggestions, I'm not sure if this makes sense :) but if it does, the code should be nicer.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux