On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:13:55PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > By "mdev-like" I mean it's very similar in shape to the general SIOV-style > mediated device concept - i.e. a physical device with an awareness of > operating on multiple contexts at once, using a Substream ID/PASID for each > one - but instead of exposing control of the contexts to anyone else, they > remain hidden behind the kernel driver which already has its own abstracted > uAPI, so overall it ends up as more just internal housekeeping than any > actual mediation. We were looking at the mdev code for inspiration, but > directly using it was never the plan. Well: - Who maps memory into the IOASID (ie the specific sub stream id)? - What memory must be mapped? - Who triggers DMA to this memory? > The driver simply needs to keep track of the domains and PASIDs - > when a process submits some work, it can look up the relevant > domain, iommu_map() the user pages to the right addresses, dma_map() > them for coherency, then poke in the PASID as part of scheduling the > work on the physical device. If you are doing stuff like this then the /dev/ioasid is what you actually want. The userprocess can create its own IOASID, program the io page tables for that IOASID to point to pages as it wants and then just hand over a fully instantiated io page table to the device driver. What you are describing is the literal use case of /dev/ioasid - a clean seperation of managing the IOMMU related parts through /dev/ioasid and the device driver itself is only concerned with generating device DMA that has the proper PASID/substream tag. The entire point is to not duplicate all the iommu code you are describing having written into every driver that just wants an IOASID. In particular, you are talking about having a substream capable device and driver but your driver's uAPI is so limited it can't address the full range of substream configurations: - A substream pointing at a SVA - A substream pointing a IO page table nested under another - A substream pointing at an IOMMU page table shared by many users And more. Which is bad. > > We already talked about this on the "how to use PASID from the kernel" > > thread. > > Do you have a pointer to the right thread so I can catch up? It's not the > easiest thing to search for on lore amongst all the other PASID-related > business :( Somewhere in here: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517143758.GP1002214@xxxxxxxxxx > FWIW my non-SVA view is that a PASID is merely an index into a set of > iommu_domains, and in that context it doesn't even really matter *who* > allocates them, only that the device driver and IOMMU driver are in sync :) Right, this is where /dev/ioasid is going. However it gets worked out at the kAPI level in the iommu layer the things you asked for are intended to be solved, and lots more. Jason
