Re: Re: [PATCH v7 11/12] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:28 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:55:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
>
> > +     case VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD: {
> > +             struct vduse_iotlb_entry entry;
> > +             struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
> > +             struct vdpa_map_file *map_file;
> > +             struct vduse_iova_domain *domain = dev->domain;
> > +             struct file *f = NULL;
> > +
> > +             ret = -EFAULT;
> > +             if (copy_from_user(&entry, argp, sizeof(entry)))
> > +                     break;
>
>                         return -EFAULT;
> surely?
> > +
> > +             ret = -EINVAL;
> > +             if (entry.start > entry.last)
> > +                     break;
>
> ... and similar here, etc.
>

OK.

> > +             spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> > +             map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(domain->iotlb,
> > +                                           entry.start, entry.last);
> > +             if (map) {
> > +                     map_file = (struct vdpa_map_file *)map->opaque;
> > +                     f = get_file(map_file->file);
> > +                     entry.offset = map_file->offset;
> > +                     entry.start = map->start;
> > +                     entry.last = map->last;
> > +                     entry.perm = map->perm;
> > +             }
> > +             spin_unlock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> > +             ret = -EINVAL;
> > +             if (!f)
> > +                     break;
> > +
> > +             ret = -EFAULT;
> > +             if (copy_to_user(argp, &entry, sizeof(entry))) {
> > +                     fput(f);
> > +                     break;
> > +             }
> > +             ret = receive_fd(f, perm_to_file_flags(entry.perm));
> > +             fput(f);
> > +             break;
>
> IDGI.  The main difference between receive_fd() and plain old
> get_unused_fd_flags() + fd_install() is __receive_sock() call.
> Which does nothing whatsoever in case of non-sockets.  Can you
> get a socket here?
>

Actually what I want here is the security_file_receive() hook in receive_fd().

Thanks,
Yongji



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux