On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:24:03AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:03:18AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Ok, so explain to me how this looks from the submitter standpoint: he reads > > your review of his patch, he acknowledges your point with "Yes, it makes > > sense to signal it with a WARN or so", and still is treated as shit. > > How is me asking about the user experience of it all, treating him like > shit?! > > How should I have asked this so that it is not making you think I'm > treating him like shit? > > Because treating someone like shit is not in my goals. > As i mentioned in my previous reply, this has to be treated as a fatal error from the user point of view, and the kernel needs to inform the userspace VMM to block/stop migration as response to this failure. Thanks, Ashish
