On 5/12/21 1:37 AM, 'Joerg Roedel' wrote: > I also thought about adding page_fault_disable()/page_fault_enable() > calls, but being in atomic context is enough according to the > faulthandler_disabled() implementation. That would be nice to add to a comment: page_fault_disable()/page_fault_enable() are not needed because of the context this must be called in.
