Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM/VMX: Use %rax instead of %__ASM_AX within CONFIG_X86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/05/21 13:21, Uros Bizjak wrote:
There is no need to use %__ASM_AX within CONFIG_X86_64. The macro
will always expand to %rax.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 32 +++++++++++++--------------
  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
index 4fa17df123cd..844b558bb021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
@@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run)
  	mov VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_SI
  	mov VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_DI
  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	mov VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX),  %r8
-	mov VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX),  %r9
-	mov VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX), %r10
-	mov VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX), %r11
-	mov VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX), %r12
-	mov VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX), %r13
-	mov VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX), %r14
-	mov VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX), %r15
+	mov VCPU_R8 (%rax),  %r8
+	mov VCPU_R9 (%rax),  %r9
+	mov VCPU_R10(%rax), %r10
+	mov VCPU_R11(%rax), %r11
+	mov VCPU_R12(%rax), %r12
+	mov VCPU_R13(%rax), %r13
+	mov VCPU_R14(%rax), %r14
+	mov VCPU_R15(%rax), %r15
  #endif
/* "POP" @vmcb to RAX. */
@@ -93,21 +93,21 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run)
  	pop %_ASM_AX
/* Save all guest registers. */
-	mov %_ASM_CX,   VCPU_RCX(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %_ASM_DX,   VCPU_RDX(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %_ASM_BX,   VCPU_RBX(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %_ASM_BP,   VCPU_RBP(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %_ASM_SI,   VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %_ASM_DI,   VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %_ASM_CX, VCPU_RCX(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %_ASM_DX, VCPU_RDX(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %_ASM_BX, VCPU_RBX(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %_ASM_BP, VCPU_RBP(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %_ASM_SI, VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %_ASM_DI, VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX)
  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	mov %r8,  VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r9,  VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %r8,  VCPU_R8 (%rax)
+	mov %r9,  VCPU_R9 (%rax)
+	mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%rax)
+	mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%rax)
+	mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%rax)
+	mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%rax)
+	mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%rax)
+	mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%rax)
  #endif
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
index 3a6461694fc2..9273709e4800 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
@@ -142,14 +142,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vmx_vcpu_run)
  	mov VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_SI
  	mov VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_DI
  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	mov VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX),  %r8
-	mov VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX),  %r9
-	mov VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX), %r10
-	mov VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX), %r11
-	mov VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX), %r12
-	mov VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX), %r13
-	mov VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX), %r14
-	mov VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX), %r15
+	mov VCPU_R8 (%rax),  %r8
+	mov VCPU_R9 (%rax),  %r9
+	mov VCPU_R10(%rax), %r10
+	mov VCPU_R11(%rax), %r11
+	mov VCPU_R12(%rax), %r12
+	mov VCPU_R13(%rax), %r13
+	mov VCPU_R14(%rax), %r14
+	mov VCPU_R15(%rax), %r15
  #endif
  	/* Load guest RAX.  This kills the @regs pointer! */
  	mov VCPU_RAX(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_AX
@@ -175,14 +175,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vmx_vcpu_run)
  	mov %_ASM_SI, VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX)
  	mov %_ASM_DI, VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX)
  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	mov %r8,  VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r9,  VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX)
-	mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX)
+	mov %r8,  VCPU_R8 (%rax)
+	mov %r9,  VCPU_R9 (%rax)
+	mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%rax)
+	mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%rax)
+	mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%rax)
+	mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%rax)
+	mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%rax)
+	mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%rax)
  #endif
/* Clear RAX to indicate VM-Exit (as opposed to VM-Fail). */


It looks a bit weird either way (either the address is different within the #ifdef, or the address is different from the destinatino), so I lean more towards avoiding churn.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux