On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 10:17 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > If probing MSR_TSC_AUX failed, hide RDTSCP and RDPID, and WARN if either > feature was reported as supported. In theory, such a scenario should > never happen as both Intel and AMD state that MSR_TSC_AUX is available if > RDTSCP or RDPID is supported. But, KVM injects #GP on MSR_TSC_AUX > accesses if probing failed, faults on WRMSR(MSR_TSC_AUX) may be fatal to > the guest (because they happen during early CPU bringup), and KVM itself > has effectively misreported RDPID support in the past. > > Note, this also has the happy side effect of omitting MSR_TSC_AUX from > the list of MSRs that are exposed to userspace if probing the MSR fails. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c > index c96f79c9fff2..bf0f74ce4974 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c > @@ -567,6 +567,21 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void) > F(ACE2) | F(ACE2_EN) | F(PHE) | F(PHE_EN) | > F(PMM) | F(PMM_EN) > ); > + > + /* > + * Hide RDTSCP and RDPID if either feature is reported as supported but > + * probing MSR_TSC_AUX failed. This is purely a sanity check and > + * should never happen, but the guest will likely crash if RDTSCP or > + * RDPID is misreported, and KVM has botched MSR_TSC_AUX emulation in > + * the past, e.g. the sanity check may fire if this instance of KVM is > + * running as L1 on top of an older, broken KVM. > + */ > + if (WARN_ON((kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) || > + kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_RDPID)) && > + !kvm_is_supported_user_return_msr(MSR_TSC_AUX))) { > + kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP); > + kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_RDPID); > + } > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_cpu_caps); > Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Maxim Levitsky