Re: [PATCH] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Please use [kvm-unit-tests PATCH ...] for the subject
Oops, I'll resend v2 with the correct prefix.

> Shouldn't this be '16', as in 16 bytes / 128 bits?
> Or possibly sizeof(*mem)?
Replaced with sizeof below.

> use a pattern other than '0', if only for giggles?
replaced uint8_t with uint32_t for more giggles and selected
0xdecafbad from the wikipedia page for Hexspeak.


>  And would it makes sense to use a pattern other than '0', if only for giggles?


> Or possibly sizeof(*mem)?



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux