On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> It is nested_vmx_hardware_setup() which overwrites VMX instruction VM
> exits handlers, but not nested_vmx_setup(). Fix the typo in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 10b610fc7bbc..f8661bc113ed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -5618,7 +5618,7 @@ static int handle_preemption_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> /*
> * When nested=0, all VMX instruction VM Exits filter here. The handlers
> - * are overwritten by nested_vmx_setup() when nested=1.
> + * are overwritten by nested_vmx_hardware_setup() when nested=1.
Alternatively, to reduce the odds of the comment becoming stale again:
are overwritten during hardware setup when nested=1.
> */
> static int handle_vmx_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
