[PATCH v4 7/8] context_tracking: KVM: Move guest enter/exit wrappers to KVM's domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Move the guest enter/exit wrappers to kvm_host.h so that KVM can manage
its context tracking vs. vtime accounting without bleeding too many KVM
details into the context tracking code.

No functional change intended.

Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/context_tracking.h | 45 --------------------------------
 include/linux/kvm_host.h         | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/context_tracking.h b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
index aa58c2ac67ca..4d7fced3a39f 100644
--- a/include/linux/context_tracking.h
+++ b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
@@ -118,49 +118,4 @@ extern void context_tracking_init(void);
 static inline void context_tracking_init(void) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE */
 
-/* must be called with irqs disabled */
-static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
-{
-	/*
-	 * This is running in ioctl context so its safe to assume that it's the
-	 * stime pending cputime to flush.
-	 */
-	instrumentation_begin();
-	vtime_account_guest_enter();
-	instrumentation_end();
-
-	/*
-	 * KVM does not hold any references to rcu protected data when it
-	 * switches CPU into a guest mode. In fact switching to a guest mode
-	 * is very similar to exiting to userspace from rcu point of view. In
-	 * addition CPU may stay in a guest mode for quite a long time (up to
-	 * one time slice). Lets treat guest mode as quiescent state, just like
-	 * we do with user-mode execution.
-	 */
-	if (!context_tracking_guest_enter()) {
-		instrumentation_begin();
-		rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
-		instrumentation_end();
-	}
-}
-
-static __always_inline void guest_exit_irqoff(void)
-{
-	context_tracking_guest_exit();
-
-	instrumentation_begin();
-	/* Flush the guest cputime we spent on the guest */
-	vtime_account_guest_exit();
-	instrumentation_end();
-}
-
-static inline void guest_exit(void)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-	guest_exit_irqoff();
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
-}
-
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index a9a7bcf6ebee..a6f47ed8b1e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -338,6 +338,51 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
 	struct kvm_dirty_ring dirty_ring;
 };
 
+/* must be called with irqs disabled */
+static __always_inline void guest_enter_irqoff(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This is running in ioctl context so its safe to assume that it's the
+	 * stime pending cputime to flush.
+	 */
+	instrumentation_begin();
+	vtime_account_guest_enter();
+	instrumentation_end();
+
+	/*
+	 * KVM does not hold any references to rcu protected data when it
+	 * switches CPU into a guest mode. In fact switching to a guest mode
+	 * is very similar to exiting to userspace from rcu point of view. In
+	 * addition CPU may stay in a guest mode for quite a long time (up to
+	 * one time slice). Lets treat guest mode as quiescent state, just like
+	 * we do with user-mode execution.
+	 */
+	if (!context_tracking_guest_enter()) {
+		instrumentation_begin();
+		rcu_virt_note_context_switch(smp_processor_id());
+		instrumentation_end();
+	}
+}
+
+static __always_inline void guest_exit_irqoff(void)
+{
+	context_tracking_guest_exit();
+
+	instrumentation_begin();
+	/* Flush the guest cputime we spent on the guest */
+	vtime_account_guest_exit();
+	instrumentation_end();
+}
+
+static inline void guest_exit(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	guest_exit_irqoff();
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
 static inline int kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	/*
-- 
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux