On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:00:15 +0100, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I interpret that as that an INVALL guarantees that a change is > visible, but it the change can become visible even without the > INVALL. Yes. Expecting the LPI to be delivered or not in the absence of an invalidate when its configuration has been altered is wrong. The architecture doesn't guarantee anything of the sort. > The test relies on the fact that changes to the LPI tables are not > visible *under KVM* until the INVALL command, but that's not > necessarily the case on real hardware. To match the spec, I think > the test "dev2/eventid=20 still does not trigger any LPI" should be > removed and the stats reset should take place before the > configuration for LPI 8195 is set to the default. If that's what the test expects (I haven't tried to investigate), it should be dropped completely, rather than trying to sidestep it for TCG. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
