Re: [RFC PATCH v8 15/19] vhost/vsock: enable SEQPACKET for transport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:46:18PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
This removes:
1) Ignore of non-stream type of packets.
This adds:
1) Handling of SEQPACKET bit: if guest sets features with this bit cleared,
  then SOCK_SEQPACKET support will be disabled.
2) 'seqpacket_allow()' callback.
3) Handling of SEQ_EOR bit: when vhost places data in buffers of guest's
  rx queue, keep this bit set only when last piece of data is copied.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v7 -> v8:
- This patch merged with patch which adds SEQPACKET feature bit to
  virtio transport.
- It now handles VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR bit(see commit msg).

drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index 5e78fb719602..0969cdc87830 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@

enum {
	VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
-			       (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)
+			       (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) |
+			       (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET)
};

enum {
@@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
		size_t nbytes;
		size_t iov_len, payload_len;
		int head;
+		bool restore_flag = false;

		spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
@@ -174,6 +176,12 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
		/* Set the correct length in the header */
		pkt->hdr.len = cpu_to_le32(payload_len);

+		if (pkt->off + payload_len < pkt->len &&
+		    pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) {
                             ^
                            (1)
+			pkt->hdr.flags &= ~VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
                                 ^
                                (2)
+			restore_flag = true;
+		}
+
		nbytes = copy_to_iter(&pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr), &iov_iter);
		if (nbytes != sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
			virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
@@ -181,6 +189,9 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
			break;
		}

+		if (restore_flag)
+			pkt->hdr.flags |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
                                 ^
                                (3)
In these 3 points we should use cpu_to_le32()/le32_to_cpu().

+
		nbytes = copy_to_iter(pkt->buf + pkt->off, payload_len,
				      &iov_iter);
		if (nbytes != payload_len) {
@@ -354,8 +365,7 @@ vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
		return NULL;
	}

-	if (le16_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.type) == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM)
-		pkt->len = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len);
+	pkt->len = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len);

	/* No payload */
	if (!pkt->len)
@@ -398,6 +408,8 @@ static bool vhost_vsock_more_replies(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
	return val < vq->num;
}

+static bool vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(void);
+
static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
	.transport = {
		.module                   = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -424,6 +436,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
		.stream_is_active         = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
.stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,

+		.seqpacket_dequeue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
+		.seqpacket_enqueue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
+		.seqpacket_allow          = vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow,
+
		.notify_poll_in           = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
		.notify_poll_out          = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
		.notify_recv_init         = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
@@ -439,8 +455,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
	},

	.send_pkt = vhost_transport_send_pkt,
+	.seqpacket_allow = false
};

+static bool vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(void)
+{
+	return vhost_transport.seqpacket_allow;
+}

I think here it's even worse then virtio_transport.c, because there may be more instances with different guests and some may require the feature and some may not, we can't definitely save this information in struct virtio_transport, we should put it in `struct vhost_vsock`.

+
static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
{
	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
@@ -785,6 +807,9 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
			goto err;
	}

+	if (features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET))
+		vhost_transport.seqpacket_allow = true;
+
	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++) {
		vq = &vsock->vqs[i];
		mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
--
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux