Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 8/8] arm/arm64: psci: don't assume method is hvc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/2021 19:59, Andrew Jones wrote:
The method can also be smc and it will be when running on bare metal.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arm/selftest.c     | 34 +++++++---------------------------
  lib/arm/asm/psci.h |  9 +++++++--
  lib/arm/psci.c     | 17 +++++++++++++++--
  lib/arm/setup.c    | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arm/selftest.c b/arm/selftest.c
index 4495b161cdd5..9f459ed3d571 100644
--- a/arm/selftest.c
+++ b/arm/selftest.c
@@ -400,33 +400,13 @@ static void check_vectors(void *arg __unused)
  	exit(report_summary());
  }
-static bool psci_check(void)
+static void psci_print(void)
  {
-	const struct fdt_property *method;
-	int node, len, ver;
-
-	node = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(dt_fdt(), -1, "arm,psci-0.2");
-	if (node < 0) {
-		printf("PSCI v0.2 compatibility required\n");
-		return false;
-	}
-
-	method = fdt_get_property(dt_fdt(), node, "method", &len);
-	if (method == NULL) {
-		printf("bad psci device tree node\n");
-		return false;
-	}
-
-	if (len < 4 || strcmp(method->data, "hvc") != 0) {
-		printf("psci method must be hvc\n");
-		return false;
-	}
-
-	ver = psci_invoke(PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION, 0, 0, 0);
-	printf("PSCI version %d.%d\n", PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR(ver),
-				       PSCI_VERSION_MINOR(ver));
-
-	return true;
+	int ver = psci_invoke(PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION, 0, 0, 0);
+	report_info("PSCI version: %d.%d", PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR(ver),
+					  PSCI_VERSION_MINOR(ver));
+	report_info("PSCI method: %s", psci_invoke == psci_invoke_hvc ?
+				       "hvc" : "smc");
  }
static void cpu_report(void *data __unused)
@@ -465,7 +445,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "smp") == 0) { - report(psci_check(), "PSCI version");
+		psci_print();
  		on_cpus(cpu_report, NULL);
  		while (!cpumask_full(&ready))
  			cpu_relax();
diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/psci.h b/lib/arm/asm/psci.h
index 7b956bf5987d..e385ce27f5d1 100644
--- a/lib/arm/asm/psci.h
+++ b/lib/arm/asm/psci.h
@@ -3,8 +3,13 @@
  #include <libcflat.h>
  #include <linux/psci.h>
-extern int psci_invoke(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
-		       unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2);
+typedef int (*psci_invoke_fn)(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
+			      unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2);
+extern psci_invoke_fn psci_invoke;
+extern int psci_invoke_hvc(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
+			   unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2);
+extern int psci_invoke_smc(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
+			   unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2);
  extern int psci_cpu_on(unsigned long cpuid, unsigned long entry_point);
  extern void psci_system_reset(void);
  extern int cpu_psci_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu);
diff --git a/lib/arm/psci.c b/lib/arm/psci.c
index 936c83948b6a..46300f30822c 100644
--- a/lib/arm/psci.c
+++ b/lib/arm/psci.c
@@ -11,9 +11,11 @@
  #include <asm/page.h>
  #include <asm/smp.h>
+psci_invoke_fn psci_invoke;
+
  __attribute__((noinline))
-int psci_invoke(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
-		unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
+int psci_invoke_hvc(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
+		    unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
  {
  	asm volatile(
  		"hvc #0"
@@ -22,6 +24,17 @@ int psci_invoke(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
  	return function_id;
  }
+__attribute__((noinline))

Is noinline necessary? We shouldn't be calling psci_invoke_smc and psci_invoke_hmc directly, it's unlikely that the compiler will have a chance to inline them. But I might be missing something here because I don't see why it was there in psci_invoke either.

Otherwise Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Nikos

+int psci_invoke_smc(unsigned long function_id, unsigned long arg0,
+		    unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
+{
+	asm volatile(
+		"smc #0"
+	: "+r" (function_id)
+	: "r" (arg0), "r" (arg1), "r" (arg2));
+	return function_id;
+}
+
  int psci_cpu_on(unsigned long cpuid, unsigned long entry_point)
  {
  #ifdef __arm__
diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
index 5cda2d919d2b..e595a9e5a167 100644
--- a/lib/arm/setup.c
+++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  #include <asm/processor.h>
  #include <asm/smp.h>
  #include <asm/timer.h>
+#include <asm/psci.h>
#include "io.h" @@ -55,6 +56,26 @@ int mpidr_to_cpu(uint64_t mpidr)
  	return -1;
  }
+static void psci_set_conduit(void)
+{
+	const void *fdt = dt_fdt();
+	const struct fdt_property *method;
+	int node, len;
+
+	node = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(fdt, -1, "arm,psci-0.2");
+	assert_msg(node >= 0, "PSCI v0.2 compatibility required");
+
+	method = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "method", &len);
+	assert(method != NULL && len == 4);
+
+	if (strcmp(method->data, "hvc") == 0)
+		psci_invoke = psci_invoke_hvc;
+	else if (strcmp(method->data, "smc") == 0)
+		psci_invoke = psci_invoke_smc;
+	else
+		assert_msg(false, "Unknown PSCI conduit: %s", method->data);
+}
+
  static void cpu_set(int fdtnode __unused, u64 regval, void *info __unused)
  {
  	int cpu = nr_cpus++;
@@ -259,6 +280,7 @@ void setup(const void *fdt, phys_addr_t freemem_start)
  	mem_regions_add_assumed();
  	mem_init(PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)freemem));
+ psci_set_conduit();
  	cpu_init();
/* cpu_init must be called before thread_info_init */




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux