On Thu, Apr 08, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 22:35:32 +0000 Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 22:16:59 +0000 Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > > > +int handle_encls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + u32 leaf = (u32)vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> > > >
> > > > Please use kvm_rax_read(), I've been trying to discourage direct access to the
> > > > array. Which is ironic because I'm 100% certain I'm to blame for this. :-)
> > >
> > > Sure. But I think still, we should convert it to (u32) explicitly, so:
> > >
> > > u32 leaf = (u32)kvm_rax_read(vcpu);
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > Ya, agreed, it helps document that it's deliberate.
>
> Do you have any other comments regarding to other patches? If no I can send
> another version rather quickly :)
Nope, nothing at this time. Though I'd give folks a few days to review before
sending the next version, I don't think any of my feedback will affect other
reviews.
