Hello Paolo,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/04/21 15:26, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> > > It's a little unintuitive to see KVM_MSR_RET_FILTERED here, since
> > > userspace can make this happen on its own without having an entry in
> > > this switch statement (by setting it in the msr filter bitmaps). When
> > > using MSR filters, I would only expect to get MSR filter exits for
> > > MSRs I specifically asked for.
> > >
> > > Not a huge deal, just a little unintuitive. I'm not sure other options
> > > are much better (you could put KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID, or you could just
> > > not have these entries in svm_{get,set}_msr).
> > >
> > Actually KVM_MSR_RET_FILTERED seems more logical to use, especially in
> > comparison with KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID.
> >
> > Also, hooking this msr in svm_{get,set}_msr allows some in-kernel error
> > pre-processsing before doing the pass-through to userspace.
>
> I agree that it should be up to userspace to set up the filter since we now
> have that functionality.
>
The userspace is still setting up the filter and handling this MSR, it
is only some basic error pre-processing being done in-kernel here.
Thanks,
Ashish
> Let me read the whole threads for the past versions to see what the
> objections were...
>
> Paolo
>
