Ed Swierk wrote: > Thanks for the feedback; I'll post a new version shortly. > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Interesting stuff. How usable is your work at this point? I've no >> immediate demand, but the question if one could integrate Xen guests >> with KVM already popped up more than once @work. > > So far I've managed to boot CentOS 5.3 (both i386 and x86_64) and use > the Xen PV block and net devices, with pretty good performance. I've > also booted FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 (amd64 only) with a XENHVM kernel and used > the Xen PV block and net devices, but the performance of the net > device is significantly worse than with CentOS. Also some FreeBSD > applications use a flag that's not yet implemented in the net device > emulation, but I'm working on fixing that. > > Overall it seems pretty solid for Linux PV-on-HVM guests. I think more > work is needed to support full PV guests, but I don't know how much. > Have folks been asking about PV-on-HVM or full PV? Not all requests weren't that concrete /wrt technology, but some had older setups and were definitely using full PV. Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
