On 2/3/2021 12:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/21 16:02, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
On 2/2/2021 10:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/21 10:04, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
#define DR6_FIXED_1 0xfffe0ff0
-#define DR6_INIT 0xffff0ff0
+/*
+ * DR6_ACTIVE_LOW is actual the result of DR6_FIXED_1 |
ACTIVE_LOW_BITS.
+ * We can regard all the current FIXED_1 bits as active_low bits even
+ * though in no case they will be turned into 0. But if they are
defined
+ * in the future, it will require no code change.
+ * At the same time, it can be served as the init/reset value for DR6.
+ */
+#define DR6_ACTIVE_LOW 0xffff0ff0
#define DR6_VOLATILE 0x0001e00f
Committed with some changes in the wording of the comment.
Also, DR6_FIXED_1 is (DR6_ACTIVE_LOW & ~DR6_VOLATILE).
Maybe we can add BUILD_BUG_ON() to make sure the correctness?
We can even
#define DR_FIXED_1 (DR6_ACTIVE_LOW & ~DR6_VOLATILE)
directly. I have pushed this patch to kvm/queue, but the other two will
have to wait for Fenghua's bare metal support.
Hi Paolo,
Fenghua's bare metal support is in tip tree now.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210322135325.682257-1-fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx/
Will the rest KVM patches get into 5.13 together?
