Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: kvm: make hardware_disable_test less verbose

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/03/21 11:43, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
hardware_disable_test produces 512 snippets like
...
  main: [511] waiting semaphore
  run_test: [511] start vcpus
  run_test: [511] all threads launched
  main: [511] waiting 368us
  main: [511] killing child

and this doesn't have much value, let's print this info with pr_debug().

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
index 2f2eeb8a1d86..5aadf84c91c0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void run_test(uint32_t run)
  	kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name, 0, 0);
  	vm_create_irqchip(vm);
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] start vcpus\n", __func__, run);
+	pr_debug("%s: [%d] start vcpus\n", __func__, run);
  	for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; ++i) {
  		vm_vcpu_add_default(vm, i, guest_code);
  		payloads[i].vm = vm;
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void run_test(uint32_t run)
  			check_set_affinity(throw_away, &cpu_set);
  		}
  	}
-	fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] all threads launched\n", __func__, run);
+	pr_debug("%s: [%d] all threads launched\n", __func__, run);
  	sem_post(sem);
  	for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; ++i)
  		check_join(threads[i], &b);
@@ -147,16 +147,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
  		if (pid == 0)
  			run_test(i); /* This function always exits */
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] waiting semaphore\n", __func__, i);
+		pr_debug("%s: [%d] waiting semaphore\n", __func__, i);
  		sem_wait(sem);
  		r = (rand() % DELAY_US_MAX) + 1;
-		fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] waiting %dus\n", __func__, i, r);
+		pr_debug("%s: [%d] waiting %dus\n", __func__, i, r);
  		usleep(r);
  		r = waitpid(pid, &s, WNOHANG);
  		TEST_ASSERT(r != pid,
  			    "%s: [%d] child exited unexpectedly status: [%d]",
  			    __func__, i, s);
-		fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] killing child\n", __func__, i);
+		pr_debug("%s: [%d] killing child\n", __func__, i);
  		kill(pid, SIGKILL);
  	}

Queued, thanks.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux