On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:22 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:52:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > My understanding is mostly, but with some objections. And I kinda > > don't want to let this die in a bikeshed and then not getting rid of > > follow_pfn as a result. There's enough people who acked this, and the > > full removal got some nack from Mauro iirc. > > Hmm, ok I must have missed that. I defintively prefer your series over > doing nothing, but killing the dead horse ASAP would be even better. I have a bunch of slow-burner things I need to fix in this area of driver mmaps vs get_user_/follow_ conflicts anyway, I'll add a note to put the horse out of it's misery in due time. We have a few problems still where things might get pinned or used where it really shouldn't be. Can I count that as an ack on the series? You've touched this quite a bit recently. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
