On 11/03/2021 13:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:42:56PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
btw can the id list have only vendor ids and not have device ids?
The PCI matcher is quite flexable, see the other patch from Max for
the igd
ah cool, do this for NVIDIA GPUs then please, I just discovered another P9
system sold with NVIDIA T4s which is not in your list.
I think it will make things easier down the road if you maintain an
exact list <shrug>
Then why do not you do the exact list for Intel IGD? The commit log does
not explain this detail.
But best practice is to be as narrow as possible as I hope this will
eventually impact module autoloading and other details.
The amount of device specific knowledge is too little to tie it up to device
ids, it is a generic PCI driver with quirks. We do not have a separate
drivers for the hardware which requires quirks.
It provides its own capability structure exposed to userspace, that is
absolutely not a "quirk"
And how do you hope this should impact autoloading?
I would like to autoload the most specific vfio driver for the target
hardware.
Is there an idea how it is going to work? For example, the Intel IGD
driver and vfio-pci-igd - how should the system pick one? If there is no
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in vfio-pci-xxx, is the user supposed to try binding
all vfio-pci-xxx drivers until some binds?
If you someday need to support new GPU HW that needs a different VFIO
driver then you are really stuck because things become indeterminate
if there are two devices claiming the ID. We don't have the concept of
"best match", driver core works on exact match.
--
Alexey
