On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:46:26 +0000, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:26:55PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Only the nVHE EL2 code is using this define, so let's make it > > plain that it is EL2 only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 2 +- > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > index dfd4edbfe360..9d1aef631646 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ > > #define SCTLR_ELx_A (BIT(1)) > > #define SCTLR_ELx_M (BIT(0)) > > > > -#define SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS (SCTLR_ELx_M | SCTLR_ELx_A | SCTLR_ELx_C | \ > > +#define SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS (SCTLR_ELx_M | SCTLR_ELx_A | SCTLR_ELx_C | \ > > SCTLR_ELx_SA | SCTLR_ELx_I | SCTLR_ELx_IESB) > > > > /* SCTLR_EL2 specific flags. */ > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S > > index 4eb584ae13d9..7423f4d961a4 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S > > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif > > * as well as the EE bit on BE. Drop the A flag since the compiler > > * is allowed to generate unaligned accesses. > > */ > > - mov_q x0, (SCTLR_EL2_RES1 | (SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS & ~SCTLR_ELx_A)) > > + mov_q x0, (SCTLR_EL2_RES1 | (SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS & ~SCTLR_ELx_A)) > > Can we just drop SCTLR_ELx_A from SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS instead of clearing it > here? Absolutely. That'd actually be an improvement. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
