Re: kvm or qemu-kvm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Oct 01, 2009 at 1902 +0200, Avi Kivity appeared and said:
> On 10/01/2009 06:51 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
> >
> >My distro (Debian) is only at 85, even in unstable.  Since it wasn't
> >current, and also the dependencies will have wide effects on my system
> >(which I'm trying to keep at the stable release Lenny), I figured
> >getting the current source and building it myself would be the best
> >move.  For other reasons I'm already running a 2.6.30 kernel from
> >Debian, which includes kernel side kvm.  So I figure I only need to mess
> >with user space.
> 
> Right, stick with your kernel's kvm.ko, qemu-kvm-0.11.0 should make a
> good fit.

Just to be sure: If I use Debian Lenny with a kernel from kernel.org,
then I can use the qemu-kvm packages and be fine. Right?

Best,
René.

-- 
  )\._.,--....,'``.  fL  Let GNU/Linux work for you while you take a nap.
 /,   _.. \   _\  (`._ ,. R. Pfeiffer <lynx at luchs.at> + http://web.luchs.at/
`._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'  - System administration + Consulting + Teaching -
Got mail delivery problems?  http://web.luchs.at/information/blockedmail.php

Attachment: pgpJ24LzdwSxc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux