On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:46:19AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +Vitaly
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > These fields are rarely updated by L1 QEMU/KVM, sync them when L1 is trying to
> > read/write them and after they're changed. If CET guest entry-load bit is not
> > set by L1 guest, migrate them to L2 manaully.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > change in v2:
> > - Per Sean's review feedback, change CET guest states as rarely-updated fields.
> > And also migrate L1's CET states to L2 if the entry-load bit is not set.
> > - Opportunistically removed one blank line.
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 1 -
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> > index 46087bca9418..afc97122c05c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> > @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ void kvm_update_cpuid_runtime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > }
> > vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xss =
> > (((u64)best->edx << 32) | best->ecx) & supported_xss;
> > -
> > } else {
> > vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xss = 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> > index 9728efd529a1..1703b8874fad 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> > @@ -2516,6 +2516,12 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_rare(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> > vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, vmx->msr_autoload.guest.nr);
> >
> > set_cr4_guest_host_mask(vmx);
> > +
> > + if (kvm_cet_supported()) {
>
> This needs to be conditioned on CET coming from vmcs12, it's on the loading of
> host state on VM-Exit that is unconditional (if CET is supported).
>
> if (kvm_cet_supported() && vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
> (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_CET_STATE)) {
>
Thanks Sean! Will change it.
> I also assume these should be guarded by one of the eVMCS fields, though a quick
> search of the public docs didn't provide a hit on the CET fields.
>
I got some description from MSFT as below, do you mean that:
GuestSsp uses clean field GUEST_BASIC (bit 10)
GuestSCet/GuestInterruptSspTableAddr uses GUEST_GRP1 (bit 11)
HostSCet/HostSsp/HostInterruptSspTableAddr uses HOST_GRP1 (bit 14)
If it is, should these go into separate patch series for Hyper-v nested
support? I have some pending patches for the enabling.
> Vitaly, any idea if these will be GUEST_GRP2 or something else?
>
> > + vmcs_writel(GUEST_SSP, vmcs12->guest_ssp);
> > + vmcs_writel(GUEST_S_CET, vmcs12->guest_s_cet);
> > + vmcs_writel(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE, vmcs12->guest_ssp_tbl);
> > + }
> > }
