On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 12:32 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:28:27AM +1300, Kai Huang wrote: > > I think some script can utilize /proc/cpuinfo. For instance, admin can have > > automation tool/script to deploy enclave (with sgx2) apps, and that script can check > > whether platform supports sgx2 or not, before it can deploy those enclave apps. Or > > enclave author may just want to check /proc/cpuinfo to know whether the machine can > > be used for testing sgx2 enclave or not. > > This doesn't sound like a concrete use of this. So you can hide it > initially with "" until you guys have a use case. Exposing it later is > always easy vs exposing it now and then not being able to change it > anymore. > Hi Haitao, Jarkko, Do you have more concrete use case of needing "sgx2" in /proc/cpuinfo? Hi Boris, To confirm, if we suppress both "sgx1" and "sgx2" in /proc/cpuinfo, we don't need to add "why to suppress" in commit message, right?
