On 2/9/21 1:19 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> Without that clearly documented, it would be unwise to merge this. > E.g. > > - Have ioctl() to turn opened fd as vEPC. > - If FLC is disabled, you could only use the fd for creating vEPC. > > Quite easy stuff to implement. The most important question to me is not how close vEPC is today, but how close it will be in the future. It's basically the age old question of: do we make one syscall that does two things or two syscalls? Is there a _compelling_ reason to change direction? How much code would we save?
