Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] vdpa: add return value to get_config/set_config callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:11:26AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:48:47AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Adding Eli in the loop.

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:20:11AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/2/5 上午1:22, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > All implementations of these callbacks already validate inputs.
> >
> > Let's return an error from these callbacks, so the caller doesn't
> > need to validate the input anymore.
> >
> > We update all implementations to return -EINVAL in case of invalid
> > input.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/vdpa.h              | 18 ++++++++++--------
> >  drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c   | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> >  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> >  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c  | 16 ++++++++++------
> >  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > index 4ab5494503a8..0e0cbd5fb41b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct vdpa_iova_range {
> >   *				@buf: buffer used to read to
> >   *				@len: the length to read from
> >   *				configuration space
> > + *				Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
> >   * @set_config:			Write to device specific configuration space
> >   *				@vdev: vdpa device
> >   *				@offset: offset from the beginning of
> > @@ -164,6 +165,7 @@ struct vdpa_iova_range {
> >   *				@buf: buffer used to write from
> >   *				@len: the length to write to
> >   *				configuration space
> > + *				Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
> >   * @get_generation:		Get device config generation (optional)
> >   *				@vdev: vdpa device
> >   *				Returns u32: device generation
> > @@ -231,10 +233,10 @@ struct vdpa_config_ops {
> >  	u32 (*get_vendor_id)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> >  	u8 (*get_status)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> >  	void (*set_status)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status);
> > -	void (*get_config)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int offset,
> > -			   void *buf, unsigned int len);
> > -	void (*set_config)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int offset,
> > -			   const void *buf, unsigned int len);
> > +	int (*get_config)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int offset,
> > +			  void *buf, unsigned int len);
> > +	int (*set_config)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int offset,
> > +			  const void *buf, unsigned int len);
> >  	u32 (*get_generation)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> >  	struct vdpa_iova_range (*get_iova_range)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> > @@ -329,8 +331,8 @@ static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
> >  }
> > -static inline void vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
> > -				   void *buf, unsigned int len)
> > +static inline int vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
> > +				  void *buf, unsigned int len)
> >  {
> >          const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> > @@ -339,8 +341,8 @@ static inline void vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
> >  	 * If it does happen we assume a legacy guest.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (!vdev->features_valid)
> > -		vdpa_set_features(vdev, 0);
> > -	ops->get_config(vdev, offset, buf, len);
> > +		return vdpa_set_features(vdev, 0);
> > +	return ops->get_config(vdev, offset, buf, len);
> >  }
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > index 7c8bbfcf6c3e..f5e6a90d8114 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > @@ -332,24 +332,32 @@ static u32 ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_align(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev)
> >  	return IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT;
> >  }
> > -static void ifcvf_vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > -				  unsigned int offset,
> > -				  void *buf, unsigned int len)
> > +static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > +				 unsigned int offset,
> > +				 void *buf, unsigned int len)
> >  {
> >  	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> > -	WARN_ON(offset + len > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config));
> > +	if (offset + len > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  	ifcvf_read_net_config(vf, offset, buf, len);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> > -static void ifcvf_vdpa_set_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > -				  unsigned int offset, const void *buf,
> > -				  unsigned int len)
> > +static int ifcvf_vdpa_set_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > +				 unsigned int offset, const void *buf,
> > +				 unsigned int len)
> >  {
> >  	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> > -	WARN_ON(offset + len > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config));
> > +	if (offset + len > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  	ifcvf_write_net_config(vf, offset, buf, len);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  static void ifcvf_vdpa_set_config_cb(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > index 029822060017..9323b5ff7988 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > @@ -1796,20 +1796,25 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status)
> >  	ndev->mvdev.status |= VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED;
> >  }
> > -static void mlx5_vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
> > -				 unsigned int len)
> > +static int mlx5_vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
> > +				unsigned int len)
> >  {
> >  	struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev);
> >  	struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev);
> > -	if (offset + len < sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
> > -		memcpy(buf, (u8 *)&ndev->config + offset, len);
> > +	if (offset + len > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
>
>
> It looks to me we should use ">=" here?


Ehmm, I think it was wrong before this patch. If 'offset + len' is equal to
'sizeof(struct virtio_net_config)', should be okay to copy, no?

I think it's one of the rare cases where the copy and paste went well :-)

Should I fix this in a separate patch?

Thanks,
Stefano

Sure.


I'll do it.

Thanks,
Stefano




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux