On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/02/21 09:37, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
> > index 57718716cc70..8027f854c600 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
> > @@ -390,3 +390,9 @@ void pks_key_free(int pkey)
> > __clear_bit(pkey, &pks_key_allocation_map);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pks_key_free);
> > +
> > +u32 get_current_pkrs(void)
> > +{
> > + return this_cpu_read(pkrs_cache);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_current_pkrs);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pkeys.h b/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > index bed0e293f13b..480429020f4c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ static inline void pks_mk_readwrite(int pkey)
> > {
> > pr_err("%s is not valid without PKS support\n", __func__);
> > }
> > +static inline u32 get_current_pkrs(void)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS */
>
> This would need an ack from the x86 people. Andy, Boris?
This looks like the PKS baremetal pile needs to be upstream first.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
