Re: [PATCH v15 04/14] KVM: x86: Add #CP support in guest exception dispatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/02/21 17:42, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/02/21 22:46, Sean Christopherson wrote:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index dbca1687ae8e..0b6dab6915a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2811,7 +2811,7 @@ static int nested_check_vm_entry_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
                 /* VM-entry interruption-info field: deliver error code */
                 should_have_error_code =
                         intr_type == INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION && prot_mode &&
-                       x86_exception_has_error_code(vector);
+                       x86_exception_has_error_code(vcpu, vector);
                 if (CC(has_error_code != should_have_error_code))
                         return -EINVAL;

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 28fea7ff7a86..0288d6a364bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -437,17 +437,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_spurious_fault);
  #define EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY     1
  #define EXCPT_PF               2

-static int exception_class(int vector)
+static int exception_class(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
  {
         switch (vector) {
         case PF_VECTOR:
                 return EXCPT_PF;
+       case CP_VECTOR:
+               if (vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits & X86_CR4_CET)
+                       return EXCPT_BENIGN;
+               return EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY;
         case DE_VECTOR:
         case TS_VECTOR:
         case NP_VECTOR:
         case SS_VECTOR:
         case GP_VECTOR:
-       case CP_VECTOR:

This removal got lost when squasing.

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function ‘exception_class’:
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:455:2: error: duplicate case value
   455 |  case CP_VECTOR:
       |  ^~~~
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:446:2: note: previously used here
   446 |  case CP_VECTOR:
       |  ^~~~

Well, it shows that I haven't even started including those unlikely-for-5.12 patches (CET and #DB bus lock) in my builds, since today I was focusing on getting a kvm/next push done.

I'll probably push all those to kvm/intel-queue and remove them from everyone's view, for now.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux