On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:46:42PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021, Yang Weijiang wrote: > > Add handling for Control Protection (#CP) exceptions, vector 21, used > > and introduced by Intel's Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET). > > relevant CET violation case. See Intel's SDM for details. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 + > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 + > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > > index 8e76d3701db3..507263d1d0b2 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > > #define MC_VECTOR 18 > > #define XM_VECTOR 19 > > #define VE_VECTOR 20 > > +#define CP_VECTOR 21 > > > > /* Select x86 specific features in <linux/kvm.h> */ > > #define __KVM_HAVE_PIT > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > index 99f787152d12..d9d3bae40a8c 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > @@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ static int exception_class(int vector) > > case NP_VECTOR: > > case SS_VECTOR: > > case GP_VECTOR: > > + case CP_VECTOR: > > return EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY; > > default: > > break; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > index c5ee0f5ce0f1..bdbd0b023ecc 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static inline bool x86_exception_has_error_code(unsigned int vector) > > { > > static u32 exception_has_error_code = BIT(DF_VECTOR) | BIT(TS_VECTOR) | > > BIT(NP_VECTOR) | BIT(SS_VECTOR) | BIT(GP_VECTOR) | > > - BIT(PF_VECTOR) | BIT(AC_VECTOR); > > + BIT(PF_VECTOR) | BIT(AC_VECTOR) | BIT(CP_VECTOR); > > These need to be conditional on CET being exposed to the guest. TBD exceptions > are non-contributory and don't have an error code. Found when running unit > tests in L1 with a kvm/queue as L1, but an older L0. cr4_guest_rsvd_bits can be > used to avoid guest_cpuid_has() lookups. > > The SDM also gets this wrong. Section 26.2.1.3, VM-Entry Control Fields, needs > to be updated to add #CP to the list. > > — The field's deliver-error-code bit (bit 11) is 1 if each of the following > holds: (1) the interruption type is hardware exception; (2) bit 0 > (corresponding to CR0.PE) is set in the CR0 field in the guest-state area; > (3) IA32_VMX_BASIC[56] is read as 0 (see Appendix A.1); and (4) the vector > indicates one of the following exceptions: #DF (vector 8), #TS (10), > #NP (11), #SS (12), #GP (13), #PF (14), or #AC (17). > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c > index dbca1687ae8e..0b6dab6915a3 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c > @@ -2811,7 +2811,7 @@ static int nested_check_vm_entry_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > /* VM-entry interruption-info field: deliver error code */ > should_have_error_code = > intr_type == INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION && prot_mode && > - x86_exception_has_error_code(vector); > + x86_exception_has_error_code(vcpu, vector); > if (CC(has_error_code != should_have_error_code)) > return -EINVAL; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index 28fea7ff7a86..0288d6a364bd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -437,17 +437,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_spurious_fault); > #define EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY 1 > #define EXCPT_PF 2 > > -static int exception_class(int vector) > +static int exception_class(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector) > { > switch (vector) { > case PF_VECTOR: > return EXCPT_PF; > + case CP_VECTOR: > + if (vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits & X86_CR4_CET) > + return EXCPT_BENIGN; > + return EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY; > case DE_VECTOR: > case TS_VECTOR: > case NP_VECTOR: > case SS_VECTOR: > case GP_VECTOR: > - case CP_VECTOR: > return EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY; > default: > break; > @@ -588,8 +591,8 @@ static void kvm_multiple_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu); > return; > } > - class1 = exception_class(prev_nr); > - class2 = exception_class(nr); > + class1 = exception_class(vcpu, prev_nr); > + class2 = exception_class(vcpu, nr); > if ((class1 == EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY && class2 == EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY) > || (class1 == EXCPT_PF && class2 != EXCPT_BENIGN)) { > /* > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > index a14da36a30ed..dce756ffb577 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > @@ -120,12 +120,16 @@ static inline bool is_la57_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > #endif > } > > -static inline bool x86_exception_has_error_code(unsigned int vector) > +static inline bool x86_exception_has_error_code(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + unsigned int vector) > { > static u32 exception_has_error_code = BIT(DF_VECTOR) | BIT(TS_VECTOR) | > BIT(NP_VECTOR) | BIT(SS_VECTOR) | BIT(GP_VECTOR) | > BIT(PF_VECTOR) | BIT(AC_VECTOR) | BIT(CP_VECTOR); > > + if (vector == CP_VECTOR && (vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits & X86_CR4_CET)) > + return false; > + > return (1U << vector) & exception_has_error_code; > } Thanks Sean for catching this! Hi, Paolo, Do I need to send another version to include Sean's change? > > >