Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/27] KVM SGX virtualization support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/2/21 3:56 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> I'll ask around internally at Intel and see what folks say.  Basically,
>> should we be afraid of a big bad EPC access?
> If bad accesses to the EPC can cause machine checks, then EPC should never be
> mapped into userspace, i.e. the SGX driver should never have been merged.

That's a good point.  However, I've learned not to assume too much about
the SGX architecture.

Either way, I think we need some architectural clarification.  If it
can't *possibly* be harmful, then the architecture docs should at least
put a stake in the ground and say so.  I'll go rattle some cages.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux