On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 07:52:04 -0500 Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/1/2021 6:42 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:54:04 -0800 > > Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> For the UNMAP_DMA ioctl, delete all mappings if VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL > >> is set. Define the corresponding VFIO_UNMAP_ALL extension. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 8 ++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > >> index 9204705..55578b6 100644 > >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > >> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ > >> */ > >> #define VFIO_NOIOMMU_IOMMU 8 > >> > >> +/* Supports VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL */ > >> +#define VFIO_UNMAP_ALL 9 > >> + > >> /* > >> * The IOCTL interface is designed for extensibility by embedding the > >> * structure length (argsz) and flags into structures passed between > >> @@ -1074,6 +1077,7 @@ struct vfio_bitmap { > >> * field. No guarantee is made to the user that arbitrary unmaps of iova > >> * or size different from those used in the original mapping call will > >> * succeed. > >> + * > >> * VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP should be set to get the dirty bitmap > >> * before unmapping IO virtual addresses. When this flag is set, the user must > >> * provide a struct vfio_bitmap in data[]. User must provide zero-allocated > >> @@ -1083,11 +1087,15 @@ struct vfio_bitmap { > >> * indicates that the page at that offset from iova is dirty. A Bitmap of the > >> * pages in the range of unmapped size is returned in the user-provided > >> * vfio_bitmap.data. > >> + * > >> + * If flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL, unmap all addresses. iova and size > >> + * must be 0. This may not be combined with the get-dirty-bitmap flag. > > > > wording nit: s/may not/cannot/ > > OK. So, the same edit should be applied to this from patch 4: > > + * iova's vaddr will block. DMA to already-mapped pages continues. This may > + * not be combined with the get-dirty-bitmap flag. > > Alex, can you make these edits please? With that, Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - Steve > > > Or maybe > > > > "VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP and VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL are > > mutually exclusive." > > > > ? > > > >> */ > >> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap { > >> __u32 argsz; > >> __u32 flags; > >> #define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP (1 << 0) > >> +#define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_ALL (1 << 1) > >> __u64 iova; /* IO virtual address */ > >> __u64 size; /* Size of mapping (bytes) */ > >> __u8 data[]; > > >