On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:45 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:55 PM Yuri Benditovich
> <yuri.benditovich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:40 PM Yuri Benditovich
> > <yuri.benditovich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:42 PM Yuri Benditovich
> > > <yuri.benditovich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This program type can set skb hash value. It will be useful
> > > > when the tun will support hash reporting feature if virtio-net.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/tun.c | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > > index 7959b5c2d11f..455f7afc1f36 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > > @@ -2981,6 +2981,8 @@ static int tun_set_ebpf(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_prog __rcu **prog_p,
> > > > prog = NULL;
> > > > } else {
> > > > prog = bpf_prog_get_type(fd, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(prog))
> > > > + prog = bpf_prog_get_type(fd, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(prog))
> > > > return PTR_ERR(prog);
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Comment from Alexei Starovoitov:
> > > Patches 1 and 2 are missing for me, so I couldn't review properly,
> > > but this diff looks odd.
> > > It allows sched_cls prog type to attach to tun.
> > > That means everything that sched_cls progs can do will be done from tun hook?
> >
> > We do not have an intention to modify the packet in this steering eBPF.
>
> The intent is irrelevant. Using SCHED_CLS here will let users modify the packet
> and some users will do so. Hence the tun code has to support it.
>
> > There is just one function that unavailable for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER
> > that the eBPF needs to make possible to deliver the hash to the guest
> > VM - it is 'bpf_set_hash'
> >
> > Does it mean that we need to define a new eBPF type for socket filter
> > operations + set_hash?
> >
> > Our problem is that the eBPF calculates 32-bit hash, 16-bit queue
> > index and 8-bit of hash type.
> > But it is able to return only 32-bit integer, so in this set of
> > patches the eBPF returns
> > queue index and hash type and saves the hash in skb->hash using bpf_set_hash().
>
> bpf prog can only return a 32-bit integer. That's true.
> But the prog can use helpers to set any number of bits and variables.
> bpf_set_hash_v2() with hash, queue and index arguments could fit this purpose,
> but if you allow it for SCHED_CLS type,
Do I understand correctly that this means:
1. Creation of new helper like
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2020-July/013036.html
2. Validation on tun side that the BPF uses only limited subset of
helpers available for SCHED_CLS
> tc side of the code should be ready to deal with that too and this extended
> helper should be meaningful for both tc and tun.
>
> In general if the purpose of the prog is to compute three values they better be
> grouped together. Returned two of them via ORed 32-bit integer and
> returning 32-bit via bpf_set_hash is an awkward api.
