The "struct CPUEntry entries[0]" in the ReadInfo structure is misleading
since the entries could be add a completely different spot. Replace it
by a proper comment instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/s390x/sclp.h | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index 9f81c0f..8523133 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -131,10 +131,15 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
uint16_t highest_cpu;
uint8_t _reserved5[124 - 122]; /* 122-123 */
uint32_t hmfai;
- uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128];
+ uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128]; /* 128-133 */
uint8_t byte_134_diag318 : 1;
uint8_t : 7;
- struct CPUEntry entries[0];
+ /*
+ * At the end of the ReadInfo, there are also the CPU entries (see
+ * struct CPUEntry). When the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) feature is
+ * enabled, the start of the CPU entries array begins at an offset
+ * denoted by the offset_cpu field, otherwise it's at offset 128.
+ */
} __attribute__((packed)) ReadInfo;
typedef struct ReadCpuInfo {
--
2.27.0
