On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:03:14AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Doesn't adding making the SGX sub-features depend on X86_FEATURE_SGX have the
> same net effect? Or am I misreading do_clear_cpu_cap()?
No, you're correct - I missed that.
> Though if we use the cpuid_deps table, I'd vote to get rid of clear_sgx_caps()
> and call setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX) directly. And probably change the
> existing SGX_LC behavior and drop clear_sgx_caps() in a separate patch instead
> of squeezing it into this one.
Yah, sounds good.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
