On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:27, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 15/01/21 02:15, Wanpeng Li wrote: > >> The comment above should probably be updated as it is not clear why we > >> check kvm_clock.vdso_clock_mode here. Actually, I would even suggest we > >> introduce a 'kvmclock_tsc_stable' global instead to avoid this indirect > >> check. > > I prefer to update the comment above, assign vsyscall pvclock data > > pointer iff kvmclock vsyscall is enabled. > > Are you going to send v2? Yes. :) https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1610960877-3110-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx/ Wanpeng
