Re: [kvm-unit-tests][RFC PATCH] x86: Add a new test case for ret/iret with a nullified segment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paolo,

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 5:12 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 24/11/20 09:33, Bin Meng wrote:
> > From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This makes up the test case for the following QEMU patch:
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/1605261378-77971-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Note the test case only fails on an unpatched QEMU with "accel=tcg".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Sending this as RFC since I am new to kvm-unit-tests
> >
> >   x86/emulator.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
> > index e46d97e..6100b6d 100644
> > --- a/x86/emulator.c
> > +++ b/x86/emulator.c
> > @@ -6,10 +6,14 @@
> >   #include "processor.h"
> >   #include "vmalloc.h"
> >   #include "alloc_page.h"
> > +#include "usermode.h"
> >
> >   #define memset __builtin_memset
> >   #define TESTDEV_IO_PORT 0xe0
> >
> > +#define MAGIC_NUM 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefUL
> > +#define GS_BASE 0x400000
> > +
> >   static int exceptions;
> >
> >   /* Forced emulation prefix, used to invoke the emulator unconditionally.  */
> > @@ -925,6 +929,39 @@ static void test_sreg(volatile uint16_t *mem)
> >       write_ss(ss);
> >   }
> >
> > +static uint64_t usr_gs_mov(void)
> > +{
> > +    static uint64_t dummy = MAGIC_NUM;
> > +    uint64_t dummy_ptr = (uint64_t)&dummy;
> > +    uint64_t ret;
> > +
> > +    dummy_ptr -= GS_BASE;
> > +    asm volatile("mov %%gs:(%%rcx), %%rax" : "=a"(ret): "c"(dummy_ptr) :);
> > +
> > +    return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_iret(void)
> > +{
> > +    uint64_t val;
> > +    bool raised_vector;
> > +
> > +    /* Update GS base to 4MiB */
> > +    wrmsr(MSR_GS_BASE, GS_BASE);
> > +
> > +    /*
> > +     * Per the SDM, jumping to user mode via `iret`, which is returning to
> > +     * outer privilege level, for segment registers (ES, FS, GS, and DS)
> > +     * if the check fails, the segment selector becomes null.
> > +     *
> > +     * In our test case, GS becomes null.
> > +     */
> > +    val = run_in_user((usermode_func)usr_gs_mov, GP_VECTOR,
> > +                      0, 0, 0, 0, &raised_vector);
> > +
> > +    report(val == MAGIC_NUM, "Test ret/iret with a nullified segment");
> > +}
> > +
> >   /* Broken emulation causes triple fault, which skips the other tests. */
> >   #if 0
> >   static void test_lldt(volatile uint16_t *mem)
> > @@ -1074,6 +1111,7 @@ int main(void)
> >       test_shld_shrd(mem);
> >       //test_lgdt_lidt(mem);
> >       test_sreg(mem);
> > +     test_iret();
> >       //test_lldt(mem);
> >       test_ltr(mem);
> >       test_cmov(mem);
> >
>
> Thanks, the patch is good.

Is this patch applied?

Regards,
Bin



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux