On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 14:45 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote: > From: Lorenzo Brescia <lorenzo.brescia@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > On VMX, if we exit and then re-enter immediately without leaving > the vmx_vcpu_run() function, the kvm_entry event is not logged. > That means we will see one (or more) kvm_exit, without its (their) > corresponding kvm_entry, as shown here: > > CPU-1979 [002] 89.871187: kvm_entry: vcpu 1 > CPU-1979 [002] 89.871218: kvm_exit: reason MSR_WRITE > CPU-1979 [002] 89.871259: kvm_exit: reason MSR_WRITE > > It also seems possible for a kvm_entry event to be logged, but then > we leave vmx_vcpu_run() right away (if vmx->emulation_required is > true). In this case, we will have a spurious kvm_entry event in the > trace. > Gentle ping... :-) Thanks and Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part