On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:10:05PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:44:05 +1100 > David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > At the moment AMD SEV sets a special function pointer, plus an opaque > > handle in KVMState to let things know how to encrypt guest memory. > > > > Now that we have a QOM interface for handling things related to securable > > guest memory, use a QOM method on that interface, rather than a bare > > function pointer for this. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 36 +++++--- > > accel/kvm/sev-stub.c | 9 +- > > include/exec/securable-guest-memory.h | 2 + > > include/sysemu/sev.h | 5 +- > > target/i386/monitor.c | 1 - > > target/i386/sev.c | 116 ++++++++++---------------- > > 6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) > > > > > @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int kvm_get_max_memslots(void) > > > > bool kvm_memcrypt_enabled(void) > > { > > - if (kvm_state && kvm_state->memcrypt_handle) { > > + if (kvm_state && kvm_state->sgm) { > > If we want to generalize the concept, maybe check for encrypt_data in > sgm here? There's probably room for different callbacks in the sgm > structure. I don't think it's worth changing here. This gets changed again in patch 6, I'll adjust to clarify a bit what's going on there. > > > return true; > > } > > > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature