Re: [PATCH v3 06/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add IA32_PEBS_ENABLE MSR emulation for extended PEBS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sean,

On 2021/1/6 5:11, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021, Like Xu wrote:
If IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES.PEBS_BASELINE [bit 14] is set, the
IA32_PEBS_ENABLE MSR exists and all architecturally enumerated fixed
and general purpose counters have corresponding bits in IA32_PEBS_ENABLE
that enable generation of PEBS records. The general-purpose counter bits
start at bit IA32_PEBS_ENABLE[0], and the fixed counter bits start at
bit IA32_PEBS_ENABLE[32].

When guest PEBS is enabled, the IA32_PEBS_ENABLE MSR will be
added to the perf_guest_switch_msr() and switched during the
VMX transitions just like CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL MSR.

Originally-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/events/intel/core.c     | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h  |  1 +
  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  6 ++++++
  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c     | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 55 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index af457f8cb29d..6453b8a6834a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3715,6 +3715,26 @@ static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
  		*nr = 2;
  	}
+ if (cpuc->pebs_enabled & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask) {
+		arr[1].msr = MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE;
+		arr[1].host = cpuc->pebs_enabled & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask;
+		arr[1].guest = cpuc->pebs_enabled & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask;
+		/*
+		 * The guest PEBS will be disabled once the host PEBS is enabled
+		 * since the both enabled case may brings a unknown PMI to
+		 * confuse host and the guest PEBS overflow PMI would be missed.
+		 */
+		if (arr[1].host)
+			arr[1].guest = 0;
+		arr[0].guest |= arr[1].guest;
Can't you modify the code that strips the PEBS counters from the guest's
value instead of poking into the array entry after the fact?
Ah, nice move.

Also, why is this scenario even allowed?  Can't we force exclude_guest for
events that use PEBS?

The attr.exclude_guest can be configured for each event, and
it's not shared with other perf_events on the same CPU,
and changing it will not take effect when the event is running.

Host perf would still allow to create or run the PEBS perf_event
for vcpu when host is using PEBS counter. One reason is that the
perf scheduler needs to know which event owns which PEBS counter.


+		*nr = 2;
+	} else if (*nr == 1) {
+		/* Remove MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE from MSR switch list in KVM */
+		arr[1].msr = MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE;
+		arr[1].host = arr[1].guest = 0;
+		*nr = 2;
Similar to above, rather then check "*nr == 1", this should properly integrate
with the "x86_pmu.pebs && x86_pmu.pebs_no_isolation" logic instead of poking
into the array after the fact.
Thanks, it makes sense to me and I'll figure it out w/ your clearly code.

By incorporating both suggestions, the logic can be streamlined significantly,
and IMO makes the overall flow much more understandable.  Untested...

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index d4569bfa83e3..c5cc7e558c8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3708,24 +3708,39 @@ static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
         arr[0].msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
         arr[0].host = x86_pmu.intel_ctrl & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask;
         arr[0].guest = x86_pmu.intel_ctrl & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask;
-       if (x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL)
-               arr[0].guest &= ~cpuc->pebs_enabled;
-       else
-               arr[0].guest &= ~(cpuc->pebs_enabled & PEBS_COUNTER_MASK);
+
+       /*
+        * Disable PEBS in the guest if PEBS is used by the host; enabling PEBS
+        * in both will lead to unexpected PMIs in the host and/or missed PMIs
+        * in the guest.
+        */
+       if (cpuc->pebs_enabled & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask) {
+               if (x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL)
+                       arr[0].guest &= ~cpuc->pebs_enabled;
+               else
+                       arr[0].guest &= ~(cpuc->pebs_enabled & PEBS_COUNTER_MASK);
+       }
         *nr = 1;

-       if (x86_pmu.pebs && x86_pmu.pebs_no_isolation) {
-               /*
-                * If PMU counter has PEBS enabled it is not enough to
-                * disable counter on a guest entry since PEBS memory
-                * write can overshoot guest entry and corrupt guest
-                * memory. Disabling PEBS solves the problem.
-                *
-                * Don't do this if the CPU already enforces it.
-                */
+       if (x86_pmu.pebs) {
                 arr[1].msr = MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE;
-               arr[1].host = cpuc->pebs_enabled;
-               arr[1].guest = 0;
+               arr[1].host = cpuc->pebs_enabled & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask;
+
+               /*
+                * Host and guest PEBS are mutually exclusive.  Load the guest
+                * value iff PEBS is disabled in the host.  If PEBS is enabled
+                * in the host and the CPU supports PEBS isolation, disabling
+                * the counters is sufficient (see above); skip the MSR loads
s/above/9b545c04abd4/
+                * by stuffing guest=host (KVM will remove the entry).  Without
+                * isolation, PEBS must be explicitly disabled prior to
+                * VM-Enter to prevent PEBS writes from overshooting VM-Enter.
+                */
+               if (!arr[1].host)
+                       arr[1].guest = cpuc->pebs_enabled & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask;
miss "arr[0].guest |= arr[1].guest;" here to make it enabled in the global_ctrl msr.

Sean, if you have more comments on other patches, just let me know.

---
thx,likexu
+               else if (x86_pmu.pebs_no_isolation)
+                       arr[1].guest = 0;
+               else
+                       arr[1].guest = arr[1].host;
                 *nr = 2;
         }




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux