On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:28:55 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/5/21 5:55 PM, Kai Huang wrote: > > Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT for use by SGX virtualization to assert EREMOVE > > failures are expected, but only due to SGX_CHILD_PRESENT. > > This dances around the fact that this is an architectural error-code. > Could that be explicit? Maybe the subject should be: > > Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT hardware error code Sure. I'll do that.
