On Wed, Jan 06, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > index 3f7c1fc7a3ce..3e17c9ffcad8 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > @@ -9023,18 +9023,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > > kvm_x86_ops.handle_exit_irqoff(vcpu); > > > > - /* > > - * Consume any pending interrupts, including the possible source of > > - * VM-Exit on SVM > > I kind of liked this part of the comment, the new (old) one in > svm_handle_exit_irqoff() doesn't actually explain what's going on. > > > and any ticks that occur between VM-Exit and now. > > Looking back, I don't quite understand why we wanted to account ticks > between vmexit and exiting guest context as 'guest' in the first place; > to my understanging 'guest time' is time spent within VMX non-root > operation, the rest is KVM overhead (system). With tick-based accounting, if the tick IRQ is received after PF_VCPU is cleared then that tick will be accounted to the host/system. The motivation for opening an IRQ window after VM-Exit is to handle the case where the guest is constantly exiting for a different reason _just_ before the tick arrives, e.g. if the guest has its tick configured such that the guest and host ticks get synchronized in a bad way. This is a non-issue when using CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN=y, at least with a stable TSC, as the accounting happens during guest_exit_irqoff() itself. Accounting might be less-than-stellar if TSC is unstable, but I don't think it would be as binary of a failure as tick-based accounting. > It seems to match how the accounting is done nowadays after Tglx's > 87fa7f3e98a1 ("x86/kvm: Move context tracking where it belongs"). > > > - * An instruction is required after local_irq_enable() to fully unblock > > - * interrupts on processors that implement an interrupt shadow, the > > - * stat.exits increment will do nicely. > > - */ > > - kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu); > > - local_irq_enable(); > > ++vcpu->stat.exits; > > - local_irq_disable(); > > - kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu); > > > > if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) { > > s64 delta = vcpu->arch.apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta; > > FWIW, > > Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > Vitaly >