On Wed, Dec 23, 2020, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > This short series adds a generic stress test to KVM unit tests that runs a > series of Unintentional cliffhanger? > The test could grow a lot more features, including: > > - wrapping the stress test with a VMX or SVM veneer which would forward > or inject interrupts periodically > > - test perf events > > - do some work in the MSI handler, so that they have a chance > of overlapping > > - use PV EOI > > - play with TPR and self IPIs, similar to Windows DPCs. > > The configuration of the test is set individually for each VCPU on > the command line, for example: > > ./x86/run x86/chaos.flat -smp 2 \ > -append 'invtlb=1,mem=12,hz=100 hz=250,edu=1,edu_hz=53,hlt' -device edu > > runs a continuous INVLPG+write test on 1<<12 pages on CPU 0, interrupted > by a 100 Hz timer tick; and keeps CPU 1 mostly idle except for 250 timer > ticks and 53 edu device interrupts per second. Maybe take the target cpu as part of the command line instead of implicitly defining it via group position? The "duplicate" hz=??? is confusing. E.g. ./x86/run x86/chaos.flat -smp 2 \ -append 'cpu=0,invtlb=1,mem=12,hz=100 cpu=1,hz=250,edu=1,edu_hz=53,hlt' -device edu > For now, the test runs for an infinite time so it's not included in > unittests.cfg. Do you think this is worth including in kvm-unit-tests, What's the motivation for this type of test? What class of bugs can it find that won't be found by existing kvm-unit-tests or simple boot tests? > and if so are you interested in non-x86 versions of it? Or should the > code be as pluggable as possible to make it easier to port it?