On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:10:16PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote: > +++ Peter Zijlstra [16/12/20 13:47 +0100]: > > Only because we're having .init=false, incorrectly. See the other email. > > Ah yeah, you're right. I also misread the intention of the if > conditional :/ If we're currently running an init function it's fine, > but after that it will be unsafe. Exactly, seeing how it'll end up being freed and such ;-) > Btw, your patch seems to work for me, using the test module provided > by Dexuan. Ah, excellent. I couldn't be bothered to figure out how to build a module ;-) I'll add your Tested-by and go queue it for /urgent I suppose.
