On 09.12.20 10:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 08/12/20 22:08, Stefan Raspl wrote: >> From: Stefan Raspl<raspl@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The new counters halt_poll_success_ns and halt_poll_fail_ns do not count >> events. Instead they provide a time, and mess up our statistics. Therefore, >> we should exclude them. > > What is the issue exactly? Do they mess up the formatting? they mess up the percentage (they are 99% almost all the time) > > Paolo > >> Removal is currently implemented with an exempt list. If more counters like >> these appear, we can think about a more general rule like excluding all >> fields name "*_ns", in case that's a standing convention. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Raspl<raspl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-and-reported-by: Christian Borntraeger<borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >
