Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 10/10] arm64: gic: Use IPI test checking for the LPI tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alexandru, Zenghui
On 11/26/20 10:30 AM, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> On 2020/11/25 23:51, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> The reason for the failure is that the test "dev2/eventid=20 now triggers
>> an LPI" triggers 2 LPIs, not one. This behavior was present before this
>> patch, but it was ignored because check_lpi_stats() wasn't looking at the
>> acked array.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the ITS so I'm not sure if this is expected, if the
>> test is incorrect or if there is something wrong with KVM emulation.
> 
> I think this is expected, or not.
> 
> Before INVALL, the LPI-8195 was already pending but disabled. On
> receiving INVALL, VGIC will reload configuration for all LPIs targeting
> collection-3 and deliver the now enabled LPI-8195. We'll therefore see
> and handle it before sending the following INT (which will set the
> LPI-8195 pending again).
> 
>> Did some more testing on an Ampere eMAG (fast out-of-order cores) using
>> qemu and kvmtool and Linux v5.8, here's what I found:
>>
>> - Using qemu and gic.flat built from*master*: error encountered 864 times
>>    out of 1088 runs.
>> - Using qemu: error encountered 852 times out of 1027 runs.
>> - Using kvmtool: error encountered 8164 times out of 10602 runs.
> 
> If vcpu-3 hadn't seen and handled LPI-8195 as quickly as possible (e.g.,
> vcpu-3 hadn't been scheduled), the following INT will set the already
> pending LPI-8195 pending again and we'll receive it *once* on vcpu-3.
> And we won't see the mentioned failure.
> 
> I think we can just drop the (meaningless and confusing?) INT.
Yes I agree with Zenghui, we can remove the INT and just check the
pending LPI set while disabled eventually hits

Thanks

Eric
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Zenghui
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux