RE: [PATCH v15 6/9] arm64/kvm: Add hypercall service for kvm ptp.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 5:07 PM
> To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yangbo.lu@xxxxxxx; john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx;
> tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx;
> richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx; Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@xxxxxxx>;
> will@xxxxxxxxxx; Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>; Andre
> Przywara <Andre.Przywara@xxxxxxx>; Steven Price
> <Steven.Price@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@xxxxxxx>; Justin He
> <Justin.He@xxxxxxx>; nd <nd@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 6/9] arm64/kvm: Add hypercall service for kvm ptp.
> 
> On 2020-11-24 05:20, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> > +/* ptp_kvm counter type ID */
> >> > +#define ARM_PTP_VIRT_COUNTER			0
> >> > +#define ARM_PTP_PHY_COUNTER			1
> >> > +#define ARM_PTP_NONE_COUNTER			2
> >>
> >> The architecture definitely doesn't have this last counter.
> >
> > Yeah, this is just represent no counter data needed from guest.
> > Some annotation should be added here.
> 
> I'd rather you remove it entirely, or explain why you really cannot do without
> a fake counter.

OK, I will remove it.

Thanks
Jianyong
> 
>          M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux